UPA Government : An alliance neither united nor progressive
Friday, December 31st, 2004Author: M.V.Kamath
Publication: Free Press Journal
Date: December 30, 2004
Whatever else may be said of the BJPled NDA that ruled the country for
almost five years, it survived quite well with hardly any open show of
internal dissension, and whether one assigns credit to the NDA’s
component units or to the excellent leadership of Prime Minister Atal Behari
Vajpayee, credit should be given where credit is due. The same, alas,
cannot be said of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance which has
been showing within six months of coming to power that it is neither
united, nor progressive nor much of an alliance.
Dissension is rife within the alliance and it is seen every day.
Reports suggest that Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh had offered his
resignation at least four times in the last six months and they are quite
believable. Dr. Singh’s Media Adviser, Dr. Sanjaya Baru has dismissed the
reports as “utter nonsense”.
Nobody in his senses will take that seriously. The poor man is under
terrific pressure. The trouble is, Dr. Manmohan Singh is not a
politician. He is a harmless technician, if you please, who gave a good account
of himself as a Governor of the Reserve Bank of India and as a Finance
Minister and in sheer talent he is miles ahead of the likes of Foreign
Minister Natwar Singh, Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee and the likes
of Arjun Singh and Shivraj Patil, all of whom, according to reports,
have been operating against him.
If the truth be told, these four colleagues of the Prime Minister are
not much of politicians either. They are certainly not what one would
describe as all-India leaders like a Vajpayee and an Advani. They have
hardly anything to their credit. Arjun Singh has been involved in a
lottery scandal and Shivraj Patil has been roundly criticised even by a
sympathetic pro-UPA press for his handling of violence in the North East.
Natwar Singh’s gaffes are the talk-of-thetown. In sheer political
sophistication he nowhere comes up to the standards of a Jaswant Singh who
is in a class by himself. For Natwar Singh to hold the post of External
Affairs Minister is to insult Jawaharlal Nehru, the first one to handle
foreign affairs in independent India. Natwar Singh’s gaffes are
unforgivable. In June, for instance, he unilaterally announced, to the shock
of his countrymen, that India would review its decision on sending
troops to Iraq when the universal consensus in the country is not to oblige
the United States.
But worse is his interview to a South Korean newspaper that virtually
apologised for the nuclear tests conducted under orders from his
predecessor government. That alone should have sufficed for the Prime Minister
to demand Natwar Singh’s resignation. But the gentleman Prime Minister
merely contented himself with issuing a clarification of India’s
position on the nuclear issue. So much for our Foreign Minister.
Now take the apparent tug-of-war between Defence Minister Pranab
Mukherjee and Home Minister Shivraj Patil. On 6 December Patil announced that
in the strife-torn state of Jammu and Kashmir, there has been
considerable reduction of cross-border terrorism which, according to him had
been reduced by 60 per cent. Patil made the point that the daily average
incidence of violence which was 11 in 2002 and nine in 2003 had come
down to six in 2004. Before one could breathe a sigh of relief the Home
Minister’s statement was contradicted by his own colleague in the Defence
Ministry, Pranab Mukherjee.
If the latter is to be taken at his word, “infiltration attempts from
across the border are still going on in Jammu and Kashmir and even in
the last month there has been a sharp increase in the infiltration of the
militants”. Mukherjee’s statement was made within 24 hours of Patil’s
announcement. Obviously there is no co-ordination between the two
Ministries which is strange, considering that there is, in the UPA
government, a special Ministry to co-ordinate the work of all Ministries.
What is clear is that both Mukherjee and Patil do not think they are
beholden to anybody, least of all to the Prime Minister. To see this show
of independence must be most galling to Manmohan Singh. Both the
Ministers need to be pulled up as should Natwar Singh as well. The ongoing
spat between Lalu Prasad Yadav and Ram Vilas Paswan must surely be
another cause for Manmohan Singh’s worries.
In the past few weeks they have been behaving like street rowdies,
throwing mud at each other, in the process bringing down all respect for
not only the Prime Minister but the UPA alliance itself. What can a Prime
Minister do when two of his colleagues call each other as thieves?
Can a Prime Minister entertain two thieves in his cabinet and still
hope to command respect for his government? And the epithet, it is well to
remember, was not thrown at the Ministers by members of the Opposition.
It was an example of the pot calling the kettle black. One does not
have to listen to Paswan’s charge against Lalu Prasad against whom there
are so many charges of corruption that one gives up all hopes of Bihar
ever seeing a decent corruption-free administration. It is no
consolation that the CBDT has cleared Laloo Prasad in one-the Income Tax case.
Laloo Prasad is also likely to be cleared in the Rs. 1000 crore fodder
case as well. As Arun Nehru correctly put it: “There should be no
surprises, as the CBI or the CBDT cannot be in conflict with the government
of the day”. Besides how can the UPA last without Lalu Prasad’s 26 MPs
lending their support? Even the UPA government has to put up with
crooks if it wants to last. It is bad enough for the Congress to have to put
up with the sixty odd Leftists who want to exercise power without
responsibility.
The pressure on Manmohan Singh must really be terrific. Here is a party
with a traitorous post-1942 record of betraying the Congress and the
country, literally holding the UPA government to ransom. Their threat
amounts to: “Do as we tell you, or else!” which is another form of
blackmail.
Congress has no option but to meekly obey. Of course, the Leftists can
be shown their place easily, if Congress has the gumption to do so. It
can tell off the communists and challenge them to do their worst. It is
easy to threaten Congress but when the chips are down, the Leftists
know that if the Congress-led UPA government is overthrown, the door will
be open for the BJP to return to power.
What is distressing is that the Congress does not have the power or the
courage to take on the Communists. and it desperately wants to hold on
to power even if its allies insist on spitting on its face. It is to
such a state of impotence that the Congress has been reduced. What a
Jawaharlal Nehru or a Vallabhbhai Patel let alone a Mahatma Gandhi would
have felt at the current impotence of the party they once led is for
anyone to guess. That Congress has to so abjectly depend on, of all
parties, the Communists, is indicative of the depths to which it has fallen.
Worse still is Congress dependence on Lalu Prasad who hadn’t the
courage to face Parliamentary ire, following the tragic railway accident in
Himachal Pradesh. Instead of attending theLok Sabha in session, Lalu
Prasad had rushed to Bihar to look after his political interests which are
now reportedly in great danger.
The opposition had to chastise him. But what can one say of a Lalu
Prasad who rules Bihar through his wife, whose `lower’ bureaucracy and the
police are involved with criminal interests and, as Arun Nehru so aptly
says, the “senior officials play the survival game and look the other
way”. There is that criminal Pappu Yadav, confined in jail but who,
thanks to obliging jail officials, puts in telephone calls from inside the
prison to several ministers, making a mockery of law?
In Bihar, as everyone knows there is no law, let alone order. Criminals
thrive and Sonia Gandhi’s Congress looks the other way as if
criminality in Bihar is none of its business. Isis any wonder then, that rumours
are afloat in the capital that Manmohan Singh has been obliged four
times in six months to hand in his resignation to the Congress President?
If Manmohan Singh goes, who can replace him?
An Arjun Singh? He has already divided the country, and with him as a
Prime Minister, the country can honestly be expected to be torn as
under. Would Pranab Mukherjee be a good candidate? What stature does he have
in the country? None. So would that mean that Sonia Gandhi should take
over the reins of office? What would that do to her image as a `tyagi’?
So poor Manmohan Singh has to take the attacks on him from left, right
and centre and carry on, like Jeeves, as best as he can. But surely he
knows that even his best cannot hold the party or the alliance
together. And to top it all the CPI (M) politburo a pompous word for a poor
party executive committee has decided to support Samajwadi Party
candidates against the Congress in by-elections in Uttar Pradesh. The Samajwadi
Party preens itself on being a non-communal party when all the world
knows that it banks heavily on the Muslim and caste votes.
In Uttar Pradesh, as in India, seeking Muslim votes is not `communal’.
Seeking Hindu votes, is. Our political leaders have a great sense of
humour. The right and most sensible thing for the Congress to do is to
forget its pretenses and come to terms with the BJP. A Congress-BJP
government would be a truly national government and will remain
unchallengeable. But, as the saying goes, who will bell this cat?
Hardly seven months have passed since the UPA government came to power
and it is already showing signs of strain. It is easier to run a
government than tame the Natwar Singhs, Arjun Singhs and Harkishen Singh
Surjeets, not to speak of the Ram Vilas Paswans and the irrepressible Lalu
Prasad Yadav. That India still makes progress in many fields shows not
the competence of the UPA but the resilience of the people who have
suffered so many calamities in the past that they can well survive the
current crop of irresponsible politicians, with noticeable nonchalance.
In a bare seven months the Congress has shown itself incapable of
running the country. If this is considered `utter nonsense’, let Sonia
Gandhi order fresh national elections. The Indian public illiterate,
poverty-stricken public is more politically sophisticated than many would give
it credit.